Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Articles published in the Industrial Engineering and Management Journal have gone through the process of identifying plagiarism through Google Scholar and the On-line Plagiarism Checker and reviewed by Bestari Partners (peer-reviewers). The decision to accept or not a scientific article in this journal is the right of the Editorial Board based on the recommendation of Mitra Bestari.

Since April 2016 (first edition), the Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management only accepts articles derived from research results.

JIEM includes contributions, but is not limited to, in the following areas:

  1. System Modeling
  2. Production system
  3. Manufacturing System
  4. Ergonomics and System Design Work
  5. Product design
  6. Logistics and Supply Chain Management
  7. Performance Management
  8. Industry Optimization
  9. Industrial System Simulation
  10. Operational Research
  11. Occupational Safety and Health in Industry

Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management can be sent electronically in the form of a file via email:  jiem@umi.ac.id  or sent directly to https://jurnal.teknologiindustriumi.ac.id/index.php/JIEM


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Manajemen Teknik Industri (ISSN 2503-1430 (Print) dan No.ISSN : 2541-3090 (Online))
adalah jurnal Open Access yang bebas diakses dan dibaca di Internet dengan prinsip pembuatannya
penelitian yang tersedia secara bebas untuk umum mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar


Publication Ethics

Journal of Industrial Engineering Management with registered numbers ISSN 2503-1430 (Print), ISSN 2541-3090 (Online) is a peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online and published twice a year. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in this journal, including the Author, Editor in Chief, Editorial Board, Peer-Reviewer and Publisher (Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Muslim Indonesia). This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines

The publication of articles in the peer-reviewed Journal of Industrial Engineering Management is an essential building block in developing a coherent and respected knowledge network. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the authors' work and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore essential to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

Publication decision

The Industrial Engineering Management Journal Editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the discretion of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor evaluates manuscripts at all times for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.


Editors and any editorial staff may not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the respective authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the editor's research without the author's written consent.

Reviewer's Task

Editorial Decision Contribution

Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that immediate review is not possible must notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.


Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor. Overview

Objectivity Standard

It must be done objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that the authors have not cited. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers should also call the editor's attention to any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with the authors, companies, or institutions with which the papers are related.

Writer's Task

Reporting Standard

Authors of the original research report must present an accurate account of the work done as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately on paper. A paper must contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, then these have been appropriately cited or cited.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications


An author may not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or significant publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Source Acknowledgment

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Paper Writing

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported study. All persons who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. Others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, and they must be recognized or listed as contributors. Correspondence authors must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper. All co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and approved its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, the author must immediately notify the journal editor.